Exploration or Espionage? Europe’s First Intelligence Missions into Africa

Rethinking “Exploration

European exploration of Africa is traditionally narrated as a heroic saga of curiosity, endurance, and scientific discovery. Names such as Prince Henry the Navigator, Mungo Park, René Caillié, James Bruce, Richard Burton, and David Livingstone are embedded in popular memory as intrepid explorers confronting the unknown. Yet modern historical scholarship increasingly challenges this framing. Rather than neutral voyages of discovery, early European expeditions into Africa were often strategic intelligence missions, gathering political, economic, military, and environmental data essential for commercial expansion and later colonial domination.

As historian Matthew H Edney argues in his study of imperial cartography,

“Geographical exploration was never a politically innocent activity; mapping and reconnaissance were inseparable from the exercise of power.”

This essay interrogates European exploration of Africa before the formal colonial era (roughly 1400–1880) as a form of proto-intelligence work. It argues that European expeditions systematically collected information about African states, trade networks, military capacities, and internal divisions—information later weaponized by empires. Exploration, in this sense, functioned as epistemic reconnaissance, softening African sovereignty long before conquest.

 

Knowledge as Power: Intelligence Before Empire

European states entering the early modern period were acutely aware that knowledge preceded domination. The Ottoman Empire, for example, maintained sophisticated intelligence networks across Europe and North Africa. European powers responded in kind, viewing exploration as a means to reduce strategic uncertainty.

Political theorist Michel Foucault famously observed that

“Power and knowledge directly imply one another; there is no power relation without the correlative constitution of a field of knowledge.”

Applied to Africa, this insight clarifies why European expeditions prioritized rivers, ports, trade routes, population centers, political hierarchies, and resource flows. These were not merely geographical curiosities; they were actionable intelligence assets.

The so-called “Age of Discovery” coincided with the rise of centralized European states, chartered companies, and naval militarization. Exploration reports were routinely submitted to monarchs, trading companies, and military planners. Maps were classified documents. Journals were edited before publication. Information was filtered to emphasize opportunity and minimize African power.

 

Prince Henry the Navigator and Maritime Reconnaissance

Portuguese exploration along the African coast in the 15th century offers an early and clear example of exploration as intelligence-gathering. Prince Henry the Navigator did not personally sail, but he oversaw a state-sponsored reconnaissance program focused on West Africa.

Historian John Thornton notes:

“Portuguese expansion was guided not by random curiosity but by a calculated search for gold, allies, and strategic advantage against Islamic powers.”

Portuguese captains were instructed to identify:

• Navigable rivers
• Gold-producing regions
• Local rulers and succession systems
• Military strength of coastal polities
• Religious affiliations (Christian, Muslim, or “pagan”)

These missions culminated in Portuguese forts such as Elmina Castle (1482), built only after decades of intelligence collection on Akan politics and gold trade networks. Elmina was not an exploratory outpost; it was a logistical and surveillance hub designed to control commerce and monitor regional power dynamics.

 

African Knowledge Appropriated as European Discovery

A central mechanism of espionage-by-exploration was the appropriation of African knowledge. European explorers relied almost entirely on African guides, merchants, translators, and scholars. Yet the intelligence extracted from these interactions was later reframed as European discovery.

Anthropologist James Clifford argues:

“Travel writing is not a transparent record of experience but a cultural practice that transforms local knowledge into imperial authority.”

For example:

• The Niger River’s course was known to West African traders for centuries.
• Timbuktu was a major intellectual center long before Europeans reached it.
• Trans-Saharan trade routes were meticulously maintained by African and Islamic networks.

When Europeans “confirmed” this information, it became legitimate in European epistemology. African oral cartography was dismissed until translated into European maps.

 

Mungo Park: Explorer or Reconnaissance Agent?

Mungo Park’s expeditions (1795–1797; 1805–1806) are often portrayed as tragic adventures. However, Park was sponsored by the African Association, a British elite organization with explicit economic and strategic goals.

Historian P. J. Marshall observes:

“The African Association’s interest in geography was inseparable from Britain’s desire to expand commerce and influence.”

Park’s journals meticulously recorded:

• Political rivalries among Mandé states
• Taxation systems
• Military practices
• Attitudes toward foreigners
• Internal conflicts exploitable by outsiders

These are not neutral observations. They resemble intelligence briefings.

Notably, Park framed African resistance as irrational hostility while portraying British intentions as benign. This rhetorical strategy normalized future intervention. His death during his second expedition resulted partly from his refusal to engage in African diplomatic protocols—an arrogance shaped by imperial assumptions.

 

Missionaries as Intelligence Assets

Missionaries played a crucial intelligence role long before colonial administration. Fluent in local languages and embedded in communities, they gathered deep cultural and political knowledge.

Historian Andrew Porter writes:

“Missionary records often provided colonial authorities with more detailed intelligence than any official survey.”

Missionaries reported on:

• Local belief systems
• Power structures
• Succession disputes
• Social tensions
• Economic potential

David Livingstone’s travels in southern and central Africa exemplify this dual role. While publicly advocating Christianity and anti-slavery, Livingstone privately corresponded with British officials about navigable rivers, fertile land, and trade corridors.

His famous phrase, “Christianity, Commerce, and Civilization,” was not moral idealism alone; it was a strategic framework for imperial penetration.

 

Scientific Racism and Intelligence Framing

Exploration narratives were shaped by emerging racial theories that classified Africans as inferior and incapable of sovereignty. This ideological lens was not accidental—it justified espionage and intervention.

Philosopher Achille Mbembe notes:

“Colonial knowledge worked by producing Africa as a space without history, thereby legitimizing intrusion.”

By depicting African states as chaotic or backward, explorers framed intelligence-gathering as a civilizing necessity rather than a violation of sovereignty.

Measurements of skulls, climate observations, and cultural practices were often presented as science but functioned as tools of domination, shaping policy decisions in Europe.

 

Mapping as Military Preparation

Cartography was one of the most explicit forms of espionage. Early maps of Africa were often restricted documents.

Historian J B Harley famously argued:

“Maps are never neutral; they are a language of power.”

European maps highlighted:

• River depth and flow
• Mountain passes
• Defensive terrain
• Population density

These details later guided military campaigns. The mapping of the Niger basin, Congo River, and Nile watershed directly enabled colonial penetration in the late 19th century.

 

Intelligence Failures and African Resistance

European intelligence missions were not always successful. African states actively managed information, restricted access, and manipulated explorers.

Examples include:

• Ethiopia, which tightly controlled European entry
• Asante, which regulated trade routes
• Sokoto Caliphate, which limited Christian penetration

Historian Paul Lovejoy notes:

“African political systems were neither passive nor ignorant of European intentions.”

Resistance was often misrepresented as hostility rather than strategic defense.

 

From Exploration to Conquest

By the time of the Berlin Conference (1884–1885), European powers possessed decades—sometimes centuries—of accumulated intelligence. Colonial conquest was rapid not because Africa was weak, but because it had been studied extensively.

The Scramble for Africa was less an invasion of the unknown and more the execution of long-prepared plans.

 

Reframing Exploration

European exploration of Africa before colonialism cannot be understood as innocent curiosity. It was a systematic process of intelligence-gathering, knowledge extraction, and narrative construction. Explorers functioned as scouts, missionaries as informants, and maps as weapons.

To reframe exploration as espionage is not anachronistic—it is historically accurate. As historian Frederick Cooper reminds us:

“Empire was built not only by force but by information.”

Recognizing this reality restores African agency, exposes the politics of knowledge, and dismantles the myth of discovery that has long obscured the true nature of Europe’s early engagement with Africa.

References: 

Edney, Matthew H. Mapping an Empire: The Geographical Construction of British India, 1765–1843. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.
Harley, J. B. “Deconstructing the Map.” Cartographica 26, no. 2 (1989): 1–20.
Harley, J. B. “Maps, Knowledge, and Power.” In The Iconography of Landscape, edited by Denis Cosgrove and Stephen Daniels, 277–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Pickles, John. A History of Spaces: Cartographic Reason, Mapping, and the Geo-Coded World. London: Routledge, 2004.
Akerman, James R., ed. The Imperial Map: Cartography and the Mastery of Empire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.

Foucault, Michel. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. Edited by Colin Gordon. New York: Pantheon Books, 1980.
Said, Edward W. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books, 1978.
Cooper, Frederick. Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005.
Mbembe, Achille. On the Postcolony. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001.
Scott, James C. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.

Thornton, John. Africa and Africans in the Making of the Atlantic World, 1400–1800. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Russell-Wood, A. J. R. A World on the Move: The Portuguese in Africa, Asia, and America, 1415–1808. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1992.
Diffie, Bailey W., and George D. Winius. Foundations of the Portuguese Empire, 1415–1580. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1977.
Disney, A. R. A History of Portugal and the Portuguese Empire. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Clifford, James. Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.
Pratt, Mary Louise. Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2008.
Fabian, Johannes. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983.

Park, Mungo. Travels in the Interior Districts of Africa. London: W. Bulmer and Co., 1799.
Marshall, P. J. The Making and Unmaking of Empires: Britain, India, and America c.1750–1783. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Curtin, Philip D. The Image of Africa: British Ideas and Action, 1780–1850. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1964.
Cain, P. J., and A. G. Hopkins. British Imperialism, 1688–2000. 2nd ed. London: Longman, 2002.

Porter, Andrew. Religion Versus Empire? British Protestant Missionaries and Overseas Expansion, 1700–1914. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2004.
Livingstone, David. Missionary Travels and Researches in South Africa. London: John Murray, 1857.
Comaroff, Jean, and John Comaroff. Of Revelation and Revolution. Vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
Etherington, Norman. Missions and Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

Gould, Stephen Jay. The Mismeasure of Man. New York: W. W. Norton, 1981.
Stocking, George W. Victorian Anthropology. New York: Free Press, 1987.
Mudimbe, V. Y. The Invention of Africa: Gnosis, Philosophy, and the Order of Knowledge. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988.

Lovejoy, Paul E. Transformations in Slavery: A History of Slavery in Africa. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Reid, Richard. Warfare in African History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Iliffe, John. Africans: The History of a Continent. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Falola, Toyin. African Politics in Postimperial Times. Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2009.

Pakenham, Thomas. The Scramble for Africa: White Man’s Conquest of the Dark Continent, 1876–1912. New York: Random House, 1991.
Chamberlain, Muriel E. The Scramble for Africa. 4th ed. London: Routledge, 2014.
Stoler, Ann Laura. Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.